Good evening.
I'm William D. Cohan, the author of six books and a former M&A banker. Welcome back to Dry Powder, my private email about what's really happening on Wall Street.
If you haven't yet had the chance, you'll need to subscribe to Puck to read my latest column in full. Inner Circle members will also have access to off-the-record conference calls with Puck writers like myself, Dylan Byers, Matthew Belloni, Julia Ioffe, and more.
In the meantime, please enjoy this free preview of Dry Powder, concerning what I’m hearing from insiders about Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr.'s high-stakes investigation into the Trump Organization—and what should worry Wall Street if the grand jury actually returns an indictment.
Most financial projections are rosy, as Wall Street well knows. That’s why banks have credit committees in the first place. But winning the case may prove more troublesome than having opened it at all. In May, Cyrus Vance, the Manhattan district attorney, convened a grand jury to consider whether the Trump Organization and any of its dozen or so employees, including Donald Trump and Alan Weisselberg, the company’s chief financial officer, should be indicted. At the time, Vance said the grand jury would meet three times a week for six months. Of course, that six-month clock ends next month, and Vance will be leaving office at the end of the year, replaced, most likely, by Alvin Bragg, the winner of Democratic primary race for Vance’s vacant seat. And so it seems like a fortuitous moment to consider the remarkable prospect of criminal charges being brought against Trump—and whether Bragg would actually decide to prosecute the case should the grand jury hand up an indictment of the former president.
At the turn of the millennium, I spent a month on a Manhattan grand jury. I was elected secretary, meaning that I was the one who tallied the votes of my fellow 23 jurists after each prosecutor’s presentation and the one who conveyed the votes to the Manhattan district attorney’s office. I learned more than a little something about the way people vote on a grand jury. And I am here to tell you that the old saw about a grand jury being willing to indict a ham sandwich is true, even if the actual expression is “a grand jury would indict a ham sandwich in the death of a pig,” which, as one district attorney told me, provides the expression an entirely different context. In any event, it is the rare grand jury that does not indict, just as it is the rare scorpion that doesn’t sting.
So, if one of Vance’s assistant district attorneys actually asks a Manhattan grand jury to consider the indictment of Donald J. Trump, it appears a virtual certainty that Trump will be indicted. That’s just what grand juries do, by and large. What exactly the indictment would say is anyone’s guess at this moment, and those who know what it might contain aren’t talking, for obvious reasons. But there have been plenty of rumors circulating around town about what Vance has been investigating...
FOUR STORIES WE'RE TALKING ABOUT After undertaking a years-long effort to diversify its membership, it’s clear the Academy wants to do more to bring about change. MATTHEW BELLONI This year’s gubernatorial race is both tamer than ever and yet more indicative of what wins in politics in our post-Trump age. PETER HAMBY Plus: What really happened at “the Google of modern politics” after Reid Hoffman's eight-figure venture capital bailout. THEODORE SCHLEIFER Musk is an exception, but it will be up to businesses to accommodate their employees who want to work in non-traditional locations. WILLIAM D. COHAN |
-
Join Puck
Directly Supporting Authors
A new economic model in which writers are also partners in the business.
Personalized Subscriptions
Customize your settings to receive the newsletters you want from the authors you follow.
Stay in the Know
Connect directly with Puck talent through email and exclusive events.