|
 Welcome back to Dry Powder...
...And thanks as always for your interest in Puck, our new media company covering the intersection of Wall Street, Washington, Silicon Valley, and Hollywood.
As a reminder, you're receiving the free version of Dry Powder at . If you're enjoying these notes, consider subscribing or sharing the subscription link with a friend for full access to Dry Powder, podcasts, events, and every other journalist on the Puck platform.
Bill
SPONSORED BY 
 Why didn’t Microsoft buy Activision with its near-all-time-high stock? Why did Michael Saylor convert MicroStrategy’s treasury reserves into Bitcoin? Perhaps it’s because, as Ray Dalio says, “cash is trash.” In the near-zero interest rate environment that the Federal Reserve has imposed on us for more than a decade, a question vexing many of the most successful corporate executives is what to do with the cash building up on their balance sheets. Big Tech, no surprise, is sitting on the motherlode. Apple has $190 billion of cash. Alphabet, the parent company of Google, has a cash pile of $142 billion. Amazon has $79 billion in cash. Meta, formerly Facebook, has $58 billion. Microsoft, the second most valuable company in the United States, with a market value of $2.2 trillion, has a cash balance of $131 billion. Or it did, until last week, when the company announced that it would be using about $70 billion of it to pay for Activision Blizzard, its shiny, new gaming behemoth.
It has not been fashionable in recent years for big companies to pay for big acquisitions using their own cash hordes. For starters, most companies don’t have enough cash on hand to expend on buying another company. And those that do have the cash often prefer to preserve that cash for other purposes, such as paying down debt, paying dividends to their shareholders or using it to buy back stock. Or to save it for a rainy day. Such decisions tend to ebb and flow depending on the economic cycles, of course, but after a 13-year bull-market, the biggest acquisitions lately have been done using stock, since the equity value of many companies is at or near all time highs (or was, until the ongoing correction kicked in). Why not use high-priced stock to make an acquisition, the thinking goes, since it may all be just so much funny money anyway?
ADVERTISEMENT 
FOUR STORIES WE'RE TALKING ABOUT  With apologies to Wall Street, the streamer's stock price apocalypse is a market problem more than a business problem. MATTHEW BELLONI  A conversation with Fiona Hill about the Russia-Ukraine crisis, Putin's next move, and where the White House goes from here. JULIA IOFFE  The inside conversation about Silicon Valley’s favorite charity, MacKenzie Scott, and Bezos’ latest effort to perfect his physique. TEDDY SCHLEIFER  Notes on Peloton’s market value collapse, Netflix’s future, M&A arbitrage, and Apollo’s next potential pound of flesh. WILLIAM D. COHAN
You received this message because you signed up to receive emails from Puck.
Was this email forwarded to you?
Sent to
Puck is published by Heat Media LLC.
For support, just reply to this e-mail. For brand partnerships, email ads@puck.news |
-
Join Puck
Directly Supporting Authors
A new economic model in which writers are also partners in the business.
Personalized Subscriptions
Customize your settings to receive the newsletters you want from the authors you follow.
Stay in the Know
Connect directly with Puck talent through email and exclusive events.
